©ALL CONTENT OF THIS WEBSITE IS COPYRIGHTED AND CANNOT BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE ADMINISTRATORS CONSENT 2003-2020



AAS Powder Displacement

powders101

AnaSCI VET
Sep 21, 2007
1,556
0
0
The LAB
By: Mr.Rose


I have a new article to post up, and It involves that little bit of information that EVERYONE neglects... Displa***ent!!

What was that Newbie? You thought it was 0.75 or 0.85 mL's per gram of powder. Oh how wrong you were. Ask yourself how can every steroid with so many different ester weights, weight the same? They can't. So I have done what I always do, save the day with my articles.

Lets look at the chart. I have only added a short list for now, I will update it as I have time.

Densities of Common Steroid Powders (Dry Weight) per mL aka CC aka cm^3.

Testosterone Base - Density 1.12g/mL
Testosterone Propionate - Density 1.10g/mL
Testosterone Enanthate - Density 1.06g/mL
Testosterone Cypionate - Density 1.10g/mL
Testosterone Decanoate - Density 1.04g/mL
Testosterone Isocaproate - Density 1.07g/mL
Testosterone Phenylpropionate - Density 1.13g/mL
Trenbolone Acetate - Density 1.18g/mL
Trenbolone Enanthate - Density 1.10g/mL
Nandrolone Decanoate - Density 1.04g/mL
Masterone propionate - Density 1.07g/mL

Ok but what does that all mean Mr.Rose? It means when we add 1 gram of powder to our solvent mixture (that's the oil, BB, BA mix) it will displace the mixture at this amount:

Testosterone Base - 1g Displaces 0.893mL
Testosterone Propionate - 1g Displaces 0.909mL
Testosterone Enanthate - 1g Displaces 0.943mL
Testosterone Cypionate - 1g Displaces 0.909mL
Testosterone Decanoate - 1g Displaces 0.962mL
Testosterone Isocaproate - 1g Displaces 0.935mL
Testosterone Phenylpropionate - 1g Displaces 0.885mL
Trenbolone Acetate - 1g Displaces 0.848mL
Trenbolone Enanthate - 1g Displaces 0.909mL
Nandrolone Decanoate - 1g Displaces 0.962mL
Masterone Propionate - 1g Displaces 0.935mL

Now for the love of god PLEASE STOP using 0.75 or 0.85mL per gram. It won't matter much if you make 10-50mL but when you make a lot... you will screw up dosages and ratio's.
 

Collinb

Registered User
Sep 29, 2012
719
0
0
Would that displacement carry over for other compunds with the same ester lengths? Like would Test Phenylpropinate have the same density and displacement as Nandorolone Phenylpropinate?
 

striffe

AnaSCI VET
Feb 6, 2012
2,450
0
0
USA
Would that displacement carry over for other compunds with the same ester lengths? Like would Test Phenylpropinate have the same density and displacement as Nandorolone Phenylpropinate?

I wouldnt think so, infact, no im sure it doesnt.
 

Collinb

Registered User
Sep 29, 2012
719
0
0
Yeah I noticed it doesnt, Im having a hard time finding a list of the densities and displacements of each powder type
 

striffe

AnaSCI VET
Feb 6, 2012
2,450
0
0
USA
Yeah I noticed it doesnt, Im having a hard time finding a list of the densities and displacements of each powder type

Hes got most of the popular ones there. He says hes going to add to the list. If there is something inparticular you are looking for, ask him.
 

striffe

AnaSCI VET
Feb 6, 2012
2,450
0
0
USA
Yeah I noticed it doesnt, Im having a hard time finding a list of the densities and displacements of each powder type

Hes got most of the popular ones there. He says hes going to add to the list. If there is something inparticular you are looking for, ask him.
 

basskiller

AnaSCI VIP
Oct 29, 2004
843
0
0
the reasoning behind using 0.85ML is because it's an average. The calculator was meant for Joe Bodybuilder to home brew his own gear. Most people won't have a super accurate weight scale.. Most won't have access to a real "clean room" lab or even laminar flow hood..
So the we just use an average.

If your making gear that accurate, then you should already know the formula to figure out weight to volume displacement.
 

Collinb

Registered User
Sep 29, 2012
719
0
0
Good point, its pretty close no matter what, but I did end up finding the displacement of NPP, which is what I was initially wondering. Its

.885mL/g displacement
 

striffe

AnaSCI VET
Feb 6, 2012
2,450
0
0
USA
the reasoning behind using 0.85ML is because it's an average. The calculator was meant for Joe Bodybuilder to home brew his own gear. Most people won't have a super accurate weight scale.. Most won't have access to a real "clean room" lab or even laminar flow hood..
So the we just use an average.

If your making gear that accurate, then you should already know the formula to figure out weight to volume displacement.

Basskiller, just wanted to thank you for the great resource you have made available. Ive learned lots from you through this journey. Not to say there is always lots more to learn.
Ive used your website for a long time, but i always calculated my own recipes. I never looked at the calculator until recently. Somehow, I overlooked it for a long time. I wish i knew about it when i first started messing with my own brew. As for weight to volume displacement, ive always used .8 or .85, but over time my batches have increased in size, using the correct weight to volume displacement has become more important.
Thanks again BK!
 

Collinb

Registered User
Sep 29, 2012
719
0
0
Seriously have to agree. I am learning as much as I can, going to have a go at brewing this winter in about a month or two. Your site and posts on forums as well as powders posts here have literally given me all I need.
 

Ironbuilt

Banned
Nov 11, 2012
8,353
0
0
Mûnich , Germany
Come on ruhl
Sounds like you know what you're doing so do what hijacked prescribed bro. People will respect you more that way. Its cool you stopped and id like to get to know what you got .thanks.