AnaSCI - Fitness Evolved

Buy Needles and Syringes with NO PRESCRIPTION   Synthetek Muscle Building And Fat Loss Products   Cheap Pure Supplements

©ALL CONTENT OF THIS WEBSITE IS COPYRIGHTED AND CANNOT BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE ADMINISTRATORS CONSENT 2003-2019

   
  Synthetek Syntherol  
   
   
   
Largest Selection of Bodybuilding Products   Largest Selection of Bodybuilding Products   Largest Selection of Bodybuilding Products


User CP FAQ Members List Calendar New Posts Quick Links Log Out

AnaSCI Fitness Evolved  AnaSCI Fitness Evolved  AnaSCI Fitness Evolved  AnaSCI Fitness Evolved  AnaSCI Fitness Evolved


        
        
        
        
        

Automatic Translations (Powered by Yandex):
Albanian Belarusian Catalan Czech Danish Dutch English Estonian Finnish French German Greek Hungarian Italian Latvian Lithuanian Macedonian Norwegian Portuguese Russian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swedish Turkish Ukrainian

Go Back   Anabolic Steroids Discussion and Bodybuilding Forum > Peptides & Growth Forum > Peptides & Human Growth Factors

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Magnus82

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
cjc&ghrp vs mk677
Old
  (#1)
WPF Champion / Donating Member
 
psych's Avatar
 
Online
Posts: 3,131
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Chicago
cjc&ghrp vs mk677 - 08-23-2016, 09:30 PM

FOR PEOPLE THAT HAVE DONE BOTH

1. What combo do you like better?
2.Pros and cons

For me mk677 was better. Bloat was a bitch. But it's PO and not subcu/im.


Fuck the judges, I'm worried about the spotters!
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
Banned
 
Offline
Posts: 4,827
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Out in the boondocks
08-23-2016, 11:35 PM

I like the convenience of mk but really have to watch the bloat. Ghrp has less bloat but the multiple inj are a pain in the ass. I do feel mk has stronger affects than [email protected] Clinical trials in AD patients showed a 60% increase in igf at 6weeks and a 72% increase in igf after 1 year while using 25mg mk-677. It was also shown in younger men to increase stage IV sleep by 50% and REM sleep by 20%. All in all I find mk to be superior to ghrp/cjc with the exception of high dosed ipamorelin.
psych likes this.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
Registered User
 
big_rich's Avatar
 
Online
Posts: 338
Join Date: Jul 2016
08-24-2016, 10:54 AM

I've always,wanted to use peptides between cycles to help maintain gain after pct but pinning that often turns ne off from it. MK is so much easier
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
Registered User
 
big_rich's Avatar
 
Online
Posts: 338
Join Date: Jul 2016
08-24-2016, 10:56 AM

....
   
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:14 PM.



Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright © 2003-2019 AnaSCI.org. All rights reserved.