©ALL CONTENT OF THIS WEBSITE IS COPYRIGHTED AND CANNOT BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE ADMINISTRATORS CONSENT 2003-2020



cjc&ghrp vs mk677

psych

WPF Champion / Donating Member
Nov 4, 2013
3,137
0
0
Chicago
FOR PEOPLE THAT HAVE DONE BOTH

1. What combo do you like better?
2.Pros and cons

For me mk677 was better. Bloat was a bitch. But it's PO and not subcu/im.
 

Magnus82

Banned
Oct 29, 2012
4,827
0
0
Out in the boondocks
I like the convenience of mk but really have to watch the bloat. Ghrp has less bloat but the multiple inj are a pain in the ass. I do feel mk has stronger affects than ghrp2@3xdaily. Clinical trials in AD patients showed a 60% increase in igf at 6weeks and a 72% increase in igf after 1 year while using 25mg mk-677. It was also shown in younger men to increase stage IV sleep by 50% and REM sleep by 20%. All in all I find mk to be superior to ghrp/cjc with the exception of high dosed ipamorelin.
 

big_rich

Registered User
Jul 30, 2016
356
0
0
I've always,wanted to use peptides between cycles to help maintain gain after pct but pinning that often turns ne off from it. MK is so much easier