AnaSCI - Fitness Evolved

Buy Needles and Syringes with NO PRESCRIPTION   Synthetek Muscle Building And Fat Loss Products   Cheap Pure Supplements

©ALL CONTENT OF THIS WEBSITE IS COPYRIGHTED AND CANNOT BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE ADMINISTRATORS CONSENT 2003-2019

   
  Synthetek Syntherol  
   
   
   
Largest Selection of Bodybuilding Products   Largest Selection of Bodybuilding Products   Largest Selection of Bodybuilding Products


User CP FAQ Members List Calendar New Posts Quick Links Log Out

AnaSCI Fitness Evolved  AnaSCI Fitness Evolved  AnaSCI Fitness Evolved  AnaSCI Fitness Evolved  AnaSCI Fitness Evolved


        
        
        
        
        

Automatic Translations (Powered by Yandex):
Albanian Belarusian Catalan Czech Danish Dutch English Estonian Finnish French German Greek Hungarian Italian Latvian Lithuanian Macedonian Norwegian Portuguese Russian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swedish Turkish Ukrainian

Go Back   Anabolic Steroids Discussion and Bodybuilding Forum > Anabolic Science Section > Anabolic Science Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
TREN vs DECA for the Heavy Weight Championship
Old
  (#1)
mikeystrong
Registered User
 
mikeystrong's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 408
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: A Igloo in Canada
TREN vs DECA for the Heavy Weight Championship - 12-07-2013, 03:06 AM

Title says it all. I want everyone to weigh in with anything they got to crown the king. ONLY first-hand experiences tho, i dont need any more lab test bullshit that a dude read out of a text book or on a scabby blog in the back corner of the internet. Nor do i need a virgin pinner spamming bro-science that he over heard from a ripped dude at the crossfit store. I want real life experiences about any topic comparing the 2 BIGGINS. After the smoke settles we all gonna walk away smarter and a little more excited for our next cycle.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
tri-terror
Registered User
 
tri-terror's Avatar
 
Online
Posts: 941
Join Date: Oct 2012
12-07-2013, 03:16 AM

I don't know exactly what to say here dude... I mean what do you mean by heavy weight championship? If just putting on scale weight is what you are talking about then deca hands down. QUALITY weight? Then tren e. OR run both in lower doses...
Something like 300mg test, 600mg deca, 400mg tren e
eat good clean calories whenever you are hungry and train like a beast and tell me what happens in 12 weeks.


"all you have to do is look at someone’s shins and hands; do they look fucked up? Then listen to them.”- Jim Wendler
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
mikeystrong
Registered User
 
mikeystrong's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 408
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: A Igloo in Canada
12-07-2013, 04:04 AM

All good man. I just want guys to put down thoughts on the 2. any topic man from sides, to pumps, to gains. just whatever u got. thats a solid gameplan tho man. i like that cycle, im assuming you would have to run aid-type supps since u running both hey?
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
tri-terror
Registered User
 
tri-terror's Avatar
 
Online
Posts: 941
Join Date: Oct 2012
12-07-2013, 04:53 AM

well depends on the person really... I can run that cycle with nothing but a little ai or none at all. Just be a little drier with an ai.
Nothing wrong with a test/deca cycle at all, it is going to put on weight and strength and at modest dosages sides are bearable. Go to high and you will be a water buffalo though lol! Love to just use some nolva with a test deca cycle.
Test and tren is going to be most bang for your buck though I feel like because it will be pretty dry and quality gains. But honestly, mixing 19 nors with lower test like that is winning IMO. You get lower sides with the test down like that, and can get BIG. You can handle a lot of carbs with some tren in you. SO get the protein down and train like a beast and the gains will come.


"all you have to do is look at someone’s shins and hands; do they look fucked up? Then listen to them.”- Jim Wendler
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
chrisr116
AnaSCI VET
 
chrisr116's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 3,788
Join Date: Nov 2012
12-07-2013, 08:58 AM

Yeah. I feel basically the same way tri terror does. I put on more raw weight on deca, but I get more vascular and can see my abs pretty good after running test/tren. I'm cycling sust, deca, eq, and mast for my winter cycle now. Summer cycle prob will be test, tren, and mast. Just goes for what look your trying to achieve, IMO.
   
Reply With Quote
TREN vs DECA for the Heavy Weight Championship
Old
  (#6)
kubes
AnaSCI VET
 
kubes's Avatar
 
Online
Posts: 2,018
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Los Angeles
TREN vs DECA for the Heavy Weight Championship - 12-07-2013, 09:11 AM

It depends on how well you do with the sides from tren as well, some just cannot handle the sides. If I was choosing it would be test tren all the way as you do not have the water weight to deal with on tren and the gains seem leaner, a lot is controlled with nutrition as well
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
Thunder46
AnaSCI VET
 
Thunder46's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,593
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Shadow lands
12-07-2013, 10:22 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by jim230027 View Post
It depends on how well you do with the sides from tren as well, some just cannot handle the sides. If I was choosing it would be test tren all the way as you do not have the water weight to deal with on tren and the gains seem leaner, a lot is controlled with nutrition as well
^^^^ This would be my opinion also, deca causes me to much water weight which sends my bp to high and i'm on lisinpril, and i just like the way i look on tren
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
Magnus82
Banned
 
Offline
Posts: 4,827
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Out in the boondocks
12-07-2013, 10:51 AM

Test/tren as well, although a high dose npp is a close second. With npp, I will never run deca again other than 100 mg/week for joints.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
Boomboom
AnaSCI MEMBER
 
Offline
Posts: 12
Join Date: Oct 2013
12-07-2013, 11:23 AM

Deca for me is better because I get ABSOLUTLY no negative sides from it. My joints hurt alot due to my line of work and while on deca I have very little joint pain. The best cycles I have had growth wise are those that have included deca. Running 800mg test E 400mg deca right now.
Tren IMHO is not worth the side effects. I do not gain size on Tren. I do get strong and lose a little body fat but the shortness of breath nightsweats ect get old. I also think Tren is really hard on your body.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
mikeystrong
Registered User
 
mikeystrong's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 408
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: A Igloo in Canada
12-07-2013, 12:35 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnus82 View Post
Test/tren as well, although a high dose npp is a close second. With npp, I will never run deca again other than 100 mg/week for joints.
Ya i dont think ive ever heard a bad thing about npp.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
mikeystrong
Registered User
 
mikeystrong's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 408
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: A Igloo in Canada
12-07-2013, 12:37 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisr116 View Post
Yeah. I feel basically the same way tri terror does. I put on more raw weight on deca, but I get more vascular and can see my abs pretty good after running test/tren. I'm cycling sust, deca, eq, and mast for my winter cycle now. Summer cycle prob will be test, tren, and mast. Just goes for what look your trying to achieve, IMO.
Wicked strategy lol Deca in winter and Tren in summer. As far as i know thats what everyone wants. Big gains in winter then slim down and try keep as much size as posable with still being ripped for summer.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
The Grim Repper
Super Moderator
 
The Grim Repper's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,323
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Making it Happen Somewhere
12-07-2013, 12:44 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnus82 View Post
Test/tren as well, although a high dose npp is a close second. With npp, I will never run deca again other than 100 mg/week for joints.
Boom!


Use code "GRIM5" to get 5% OFF your next ProfessionalMuscleStore.com order!
LIKE - ProfessionalMuscleStore Facebook
Follow - ProfessionalMuscleStore Instagram



LIKE - AnaSCI Facebook
SUBSCRIBE - AnaSCI YouTube

SYNTHETEK - Best hardcore bodybuilding products
STERILESYRINGES.COM - Get your Needles and Syringes from here
DISCUSSWORLDISSUES.COM - Socio-economic and political free speech
HOW TO DO INJECTIONS - Full Pictorial Injection Guide
PURE SUPPLEMENT POWDERS - All lab certified
PROFESSIONALMUSCLE STORE - The Largest Selection of Supplements

"How long should I be resting between sets?"
"Well, if we're talking, you should go again."


"To take a trivial example, which of us ever undertakes laborious physical exercise, except to obtain some advantage from it? But who has any right to find fault with a man who chooses to enjoy a pleasure that has no annoying consequences, or one who avoids a pain that produces no resultant pleasure?"
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
The Grim Repper
Super Moderator
 
The Grim Repper's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 4,323
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Making it Happen Somewhere
12-07-2013, 12:45 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeystrong View Post
Ya i dont think ive ever heard a bad thing about npp.
Nandrolones affect heart. PM had a thread on that research as did anaSCI I believe someone posted. But other than that potential down side (major one though) NPP is one of my all time faves.


Use code "GRIM5" to get 5% OFF your next ProfessionalMuscleStore.com order!
LIKE - ProfessionalMuscleStore Facebook
Follow - ProfessionalMuscleStore Instagram



LIKE - AnaSCI Facebook
SUBSCRIBE - AnaSCI YouTube

SYNTHETEK - Best hardcore bodybuilding products
STERILESYRINGES.COM - Get your Needles and Syringes from here
DISCUSSWORLDISSUES.COM - Socio-economic and political free speech
HOW TO DO INJECTIONS - Full Pictorial Injection Guide
PURE SUPPLEMENT POWDERS - All lab certified
PROFESSIONALMUSCLE STORE - The Largest Selection of Supplements

"How long should I be resting between sets?"
"Well, if we're talking, you should go again."


"To take a trivial example, which of us ever undertakes laborious physical exercise, except to obtain some advantage from it? But who has any right to find fault with a man who chooses to enjoy a pleasure that has no annoying consequences, or one who avoids a pain that produces no resultant pleasure?"
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14)
mikeystrong
Registered User
 
mikeystrong's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 408
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: A Igloo in Canada
12-07-2013, 12:56 PM

See, look how much i learned already. Seems like the vast majority sides with Tren and only a couple people perfer Deca. BUUUT NPP is better anyways so add that to next bulk cycle instead!
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15)
Ironbuilt
Banned
 
Offline
Posts: 8,353
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Mûnich , Germany
12-07-2013, 01:49 PM

Add age to the determining factor as well as deca imo at high doses when over 40 can cause some health concerns as Magnus .Grim and Thunder stated.. only tren i can do is tren hex but at lower doses.. test/hex/npp
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#16)
Magnus82
Banned
 
Offline
Posts: 4,827
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Out in the boondocks
12-07-2013, 02:08 PM

[QUOTE=The Grim Repper;2 article. androlones affect heart. PM had a threadI on that research as did anaSCI I believe someone posted. But other than that potential down side (major one though) NPP is one of my all time faves.[/QUOTE]

Alpha the MD wrote that article. It's a a very good read. I will see if i can find it.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#17)
Magnus82
Banned
 
Offline
Posts: 4,827
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Out in the boondocks
12-07-2013, 02:10 PM

http://www.anasci.org/vB/search.php?searchid=164609
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#18)
mikeystrong
Registered User
 
mikeystrong's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 408
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: A Igloo in Canada
12-07-2013, 03:13 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironbuilt View Post
Add age to the determining factor as well as deca imo at high doses when over 40 can cause some health concerns as Magnus .Grim and Thunder stated.. only tren i can do is tren hex but at lower doses.. test/hex/npp
im so happy with this thread already because that quote is something i most likley would not have come across. Im only 22 years old so i dont realy have to worry about that for a while but its good to know. and now other people who might be in that age range can consider that befor ordering their next cycle. SOOO STOKED BOYS.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#19)
vikingquest
Registered User
 
vikingquest's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 639
Join Date: Jan 2012
12-07-2013, 10:28 PM

Think about it this way: if I could run one of the two for the rest of my life, it would be deca. Tren is great at certain things but it wreaks havoc on your body. I don't know of if I will ever run tren again. To me, I'm just now sure if it's worth it.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#20)
mikeystrong
Registered User
 
mikeystrong's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 408
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: A Igloo in Canada
12-07-2013, 10:46 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by vikingquest View Post
Think about it this way: if I could run one of the two for the rest of my life, it would be deca. Tren is great at certain things but it wreaks havoc on your body. I don't know of if I will ever run tren again. To me, I'm just now sure if it's worth it.
I know everyone experiences tren sides differently, but for yourself what happened?
   
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
deca, tren, vs.

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 PM.


Copyright © 2003-2019 AnaSCI.org. All rights reserved.