©ALL CONTENT OF THIS WEBSITE IS COPYRIGHTED AND CANNOT BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE ADMINISTRATORS CONSENT 2003-2020



Conflicting GH benefits (to get pro size)

bruiser

Registered User
Jan 3, 2013
74
0
0
Many say insulin is responsible for pro sized builders.
and that GH is not very anabolic. Just helps keeps fat down while on.

Other say GH is responsible for pro sizes. And insulin is more anabolic to fat.

I've done both.
I can't i saw a difference in muscle while using gh.
And I know it was real. I saw water weight and fat loss.

But what's the deal? This is too contradictory.

Guys here say gh allows them to use lower dosages of gh. Others say they use it for fat loss and if you wanna build muscle stick to AAS.

Ill be honest. The posts that say gh is responsible for huge size, are usually on sites with a gh sponsor.

Your thoughts?
 

srd1

AnaSCI VET / Donating Member
Feb 19, 2013
2,311
0
36
midwest usa
Ive always been told with gh the results are dose dependent 1 to 5 ius your pretty much gonna get the fat loss and healing benifit 5 ius and up is when the magic happens with muscle growth plus its pretty much always used with aas creates a synergistic effect.
 

Z28

Registered User
Mar 19, 2014
169
0
0
Actual benifits depend on dose size and amount of time. To see a drastic difference similar to AAS you would have to run a great amount for a long time. Most of us can not offord it and try to get by with smaller amounts for shorter times than what is really going to give that shock factor the pros get