Ok, I haven't seen this topic really brought up on this forum, but it's talked about on many other forums and also in my IRL friend circle.
Let's say an individual is at the point of really trying to bring up his muscle mass. He is experienced, ran a few cycles, and his training/nutrition and diet are already in check.
At this point, he is trying to make the following decision:
-Should I simply increase my ANABOLIC GEAR intake to high levels to increase my muscle mass?
-Should I spend a higher amount of money, and just add GH to the stack in reasonable doses(even 4-5iu pharm grade) and keep the anabolics at the same level I used before?
I will try to illustrate what I am talking about to the people who are unfamiliar with what I am talking about, or are not understanding what I wrote because I suck at explaining.....
Which of these options would pack on MORE mass?(Ignore the exact compounds and doses...focus more on whether the increased AAS dose, or addition of GH would cause more muscle mass gains)
Scenario #1: Significant increase in AAS dose not including GH
-1K Test
-1K EQ
-800 Deca
-100+ Anadrol ED
Scenario #2 : Keep AAS at more reasonable levels, but you add the GH which some argue gives a "more pronounced" muscle mass effect, despite the gear dosages being lower.
-1K Test
-300 Deca
-4-5iu pharm GH
Despite the big difference in the amount of compound-use between Scenario #1 and #2, people argue that scenario #2 will still result in more muscle mass, simply because the GH is that powerful once added to the stack.
We could draw the conclusion of: Why not just do ALL of it? 3-4grams and the GH?
Well, perhaps the user doesn't have the funds, or doesn't want to use everything at once yet.
WHAT DO YOU THINK? WHAT'S YOUR EXPERIENCE?
Would 1Kish mg of gear that is highly anabolic(test/deca/tren/dbol/drol...not eq/primo/mast/etc) + some GH give****MORE**** mass gains than 3-4grams of gear without GH?
This topic and thread could be helpful for many many people trying to plan their future AAS cycles, and is a question people ask everyday.
Let's say an individual is at the point of really trying to bring up his muscle mass. He is experienced, ran a few cycles, and his training/nutrition and diet are already in check.
At this point, he is trying to make the following decision:
-Should I simply increase my ANABOLIC GEAR intake to high levels to increase my muscle mass?
-Should I spend a higher amount of money, and just add GH to the stack in reasonable doses(even 4-5iu pharm grade) and keep the anabolics at the same level I used before?
I will try to illustrate what I am talking about to the people who are unfamiliar with what I am talking about, or are not understanding what I wrote because I suck at explaining.....
Which of these options would pack on MORE mass?(Ignore the exact compounds and doses...focus more on whether the increased AAS dose, or addition of GH would cause more muscle mass gains)
Scenario #1: Significant increase in AAS dose not including GH
-1K Test
-1K EQ
-800 Deca
-100+ Anadrol ED
Scenario #2 : Keep AAS at more reasonable levels, but you add the GH which some argue gives a "more pronounced" muscle mass effect, despite the gear dosages being lower.
-1K Test
-300 Deca
-4-5iu pharm GH
Despite the big difference in the amount of compound-use between Scenario #1 and #2, people argue that scenario #2 will still result in more muscle mass, simply because the GH is that powerful once added to the stack.
We could draw the conclusion of: Why not just do ALL of it? 3-4grams and the GH?
Well, perhaps the user doesn't have the funds, or doesn't want to use everything at once yet.
WHAT DO YOU THINK? WHAT'S YOUR EXPERIENCE?
Would 1Kish mg of gear that is highly anabolic(test/deca/tren/dbol/drol...not eq/primo/mast/etc) + some GH give****MORE**** mass gains than 3-4grams of gear without GH?
This topic and thread could be helpful for many many people trying to plan their future AAS cycles, and is a question people ask everyday.