AnaSCI - Fitness Evolved

Buy Needles and Syringes with NO PRESCRIPTION   Synthetek Muscle Building And Fat Loss Products   Cheap Pure Supplements

©ALL CONTENT OF THIS WEBSITE IS COPYRIGHTED AND CANNOT BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE ADMINISTRATORS CONSENT 2003-2019

   
  Synthetek Syntherol  
   
   
   
Largest Selection of Bodybuilding Products   Largest Selection of Bodybuilding Products   Largest Selection of Bodybuilding Products


User CP FAQ Members List Calendar New Posts Quick Links Log Out

AnaSCI Fitness Evolved  AnaSCI Fitness Evolved  AnaSCI Fitness Evolved  AnaSCI Fitness Evolved  AnaSCI Fitness Evolved


        
        
        
        
        

Automatic Translations (Powered by Yandex):
Albanian Belarusian Catalan Czech Danish Dutch English Estonian Finnish French German Greek Hungarian Italian Latvian Lithuanian Macedonian Norwegian Portuguese Russian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swedish Turkish Ukrainian

Go Back   Anabolic Steroids Discussion and Bodybuilding Forum > Anabolic Science Section > Anabolic Science Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
How Steroids Became Controlled
Old
  (#1)
AnaSCI
ADMINISTRATOR
 
AnaSCI's Avatar
 
Online
Posts: 8,452
Join Date: Sep 2003
How Steroids Became Controlled - 09-02-2018, 10:47 AM

by: Rick Collins

Q: Why is possession of steroids a crime like possessing cocaine and heroin?

A: Once upon a time, in the mid-1980s, media reports claiming the increasing abuse of anabolic steroids in professional and high school sports came to the attention of Congress. Between 1988 and 1990, Congressional hearings were held to determine whether the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) should be amended to include anabolic steroids. In order to be placed into Schedule III, a drug must meet certain criteria, including that its abuse “may lead to moderate or low physical dependence or high psychological dependence.”1

At the hearings, representatives from regulatory agencies including FDA, DEA and the National Institute on Drug Abuse recommended against making steroids a controlled substance. Even the American Medical Association opposed it, maintaining that there wasn’t enough evidence at that time to prove that steroid abuse leads to the physical or psychological dependence required. However, Congress voted to classify anabolic steroids as controlled substances and President George H. W. Bush signed the Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 1990 (ASCA)2, adding anabolic steroids to the CSA. The law placed 27 anabolic steroids into the same legal class (Schedule III) as barbiturates, ketamine and LSD precursors. Individual state laws were then changed accordingly. Illegal steroid trafficking was already a federal felony but the ASCA made possession without a valid prescription a federal crime. Why did Congress ignore the advice of the experts and forge ahead with scheduling?

First and foremost was concern over the unfair advantage that steroid-enhanced athletes have over those who don’t use steroids. When sprinter Ben Johnson was stripped of his Olympic gold medal for doping in 1988, elite sports suddenly seemed less about hard work and sportsmanship, and more about who’s got the better drugs. Sports ethics became a joke on late-night television. Somebody quipped that the steroid Dianabol had become the real “breakfast of champions.” Then-Senator Joe Biden gave voice to what Congress was afraid of: “… I think you are going to see, over the next several years, some real backlash from the public about sports in America, from Olympians straight through to college sports, to pro sports. There is a feeling of resentment that is growing, and I do not know how it will manifest itself.” Empty seats? Lost profits? International embarrassment? The sports world just couldn’t afford another Ben Johnson scandal, and certain members of Congress were insistent on preventing it.

Another Congressional concern was “the message” that steroid use in elite sports sends to young athletes. Senator Herbert Kohl, owner of the Milwaukee Bucks basketball team, emphasized, “But worst of all, steroid users set an intolerable example for our nation’s youth. Every time a sports hero betrays us through drug use, he or she also harms our children.” Elected officials are always eager to support efforts to “save the children.”

A third concern was the “diversion” problem— the lack of accountability by pharmaceutical manufacturers, pharmacists and physicians over their production and dispensation volumes. Congress thought that the CSA’s “paper trail” of records would provide enough government oversight to deter illicit trafficking.

Twenty-seven years later, has the ASCA succeeded? I’ve defended countless clients arrested for possessing steroids, often in state courts, but virtually none of them were the sports stars Congress was worried about. Sports doping (e.g., BALCO, MLB, Lance Armstrong, etc.) and teen steroid abuse both became more prevalent after the law was passed (although claims of a teen “epidemic” were overblown). As occurred with alcohol Prohibition, tighter controls on legitimate products ballooned an underground “home brew” market. The controlled substance stigma drove a wider gap between users and doctors, escalating the health risks that could have been avoided by medical monitoring. As one reviewer concluded: “By forbidding trained physicians from administering steroids in a controlled manner, [Congress] has forced athletes to either buy steroids off the black market or seek out unethical and possibly incompetent physicians to supply them steroids … [I]t appears that Congress’ attempt at preventing steroid prescription has at best been futile and at worst harmful.”3 The truth is, most non-medical steroid users are neither cheating sports stars nor teenagers, but mature adults using for cosmetic reasons. Criminalizing steroid possession has resulted in the arrest of thousands of otherwise law-abiding Americans who’ve just wanted to look better on the beach.

References:
1. 21 U.S.C. § 812(b)(3).
2. Pub. L. No. 101-647, Sec. 1902, 104 Stat. 4851 (1990), amending 21 U.S.C. § 812(c) to include anabolic steroids. The law has since amended twice, in 2004 and 2014.
3. Jeffrey Black, The Anabolic Steroids Control Act of 1990: A Need for Change, 97 Dick. L. Rev. 131 (1992), at 140 (citations omitted).





LIKE - AnaSCI Facebook
SUBSCRIBE - AnaSCI YouTube

Visit Our MAJOR Sponsors:
SYNTHETEK - Best hardcore bodybuilding products
STERILESYRINGES - Get your Needles and Syringes from here
PURE SUPPLEMENT POWDERS - All lab certified
IPGEAR - Been around since 1999
ALINSHOP - The Original and BEST Euro Supplier
DIRECT-VIP - Largest Selection of AAS Available
ANABOLIC RAWS - Raw Supplier
CHEMBJ - Peptides, Raws, Semi-Finished Oils
YCGMP - Peptides, Raws, Semi-Finished Oils
UNITED ANABOLICS - Pharmaceutical Grade
PROFESSIONALMUSCLE STORE - The Largest Selection of Supplements
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
IRONFIST
AnaSCI VET / Donating Member
 
IRONFIST's Avatar
 
Online
Posts: 1,522
Join Date: Apr 2007
11-10-2018, 09:25 AM

really good read , thanks for sharing!
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
Ryan1007
Donating Member
 
Online
Posts: 41
Join Date: Jul 2018
11-15-2018, 11:08 AM

Great read
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
*KT*
Donating Member
 
Offline
Posts: 21
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: TN
11-16-2018, 12:32 PM

Good read. Learn something everyday. I can see the professional sports and young athlete idea. But with the internet like it is now younger generation can pretty much find anything they want.


KT
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
ProFIT
AnaSCI VET
 
ProFIT's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 2,568
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Porn Forum :)
11-16-2018, 03:02 PM

Good read.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
Viking
Registered User
 
Viking's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,141
Join Date: Nov 2011
11-20-2018, 04:37 AM

Interesting read. If I ever got in trouble I would call Rick Collins. Well if I could afford to!
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
SURGE
Registered User
 
Offline
Posts: 688
Join Date: Aug 2010
11-23-2018, 01:35 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viking View Post
Interesting read. If I ever got in trouble I would call Rick Collins. Well if I could afford to!
I can't remember the amount but I recall a 1 hour consult with the guy costing a fortune.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
graybass
AnaSCI MEMBER
 
graybass's Avatar
 
Online
Posts: 9
Join Date: Nov 2018
11-27-2018, 10:13 AM

I'm older than dirt so I remember when most gym owners had D-Bol and Test Cyp in the top drawer behind the counter right in the gym. If you were a regular member they would hook you up. Now they don't want you talking about it in the gym.


Just visiting this planet.
Proud member of AnaSci
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
GearPro
AnaSCI Major Sponsor
 
GearPro's Avatar
 
Online
Posts: 1,265
Join Date: Jul 2013
11-28-2018, 11:24 PM

Fantastic article!


AnaSCI Major Sponsor
List and Order: [email protected]
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
striffe
AnaSCI VET
 
Offline
Posts: 2,435
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: USA
11-29-2018, 01:22 PM

Interesting read.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
Couchlockd
Donating Member
 
Offline
Posts: 45
Join Date: Nov 2018
11-30-2018, 10:43 PM

I remember seeing this in the bigger stronger faster doc.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
gogotren
Banned
 
Online
Posts: 42
Join Date: Apr 2013
12-04-2018, 10:40 PM

Been a long time since they were legal. Just gotta learn the rules and stay one step ahead, cover your ass. If your just an average consumer you will be just fine even if you intl pack gets seized they are not coming for personal use sized packs.
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
odin
AnaSCI VET
 
Offline
Posts: 1,748
Join Date: Feb 2007
12-14-2018, 12:01 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by gogotren View Post
Been a long time since they were legal. Just gotta learn the rules and stay one step ahead, cover your ass. If your just an average consumer you will be just fine even if you intl pack gets seized they are not coming for personal use sized packs.
I have heard some bad stories over the years but in my experience your post is spot on. I never order more than 10 vials at a time and have had packs stopped but never been in trouble.


"The foolish man thinks he will live for ever,
if he keeps away from fighting;
but old age won't grant him a truce
even if the spears do."
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14)
Wolverinex
Registered User
 
Online
Posts: 30
Join Date: Feb 2019
02-07-2019, 06:20 PM

Great article!
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15)
shreddingax
AnaSCI MEMBER
 
Offline
Posts: 6
Join Date: Feb 2019
02-25-2019, 04:24 PM

I'm glad you outlined the history of that on this board, great article. I would also add that if you ever read Susan Summers book, she talks about her failing health. First she was depressed, doc. scripted antidepressant. Then she couldn't sleep, doc. scripted sleeping medication. Then she couldn't wake up, doc. scripted her an upper. By the end of it all she was on over a dozen medications and not doing well. She FINALLY went to see the endocrinologist who scripted her hormones AKA STEROIDS EKKKKKKKKKK! Once on STEROIDS her health and mental wellbeing went through the roof. She took all the meds the previous doc had scripted and through them in the trash. Which brings me to my point. Most Congressmen, once retired, become silent presidents / partners to a Big Pharma company (the whole purpose is to be paid off for passing certain bills into law that greatly benefit Big Pharma). The moral of the story is this - Big Pharma hates hormones / STEROIDS because they actually help people and there is little to no money in helping people. The law has to change which is easier said than done, it is a daunting task when looking at the juggernaut called Big Pharma who owns sooooooo many politicians.
   
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Copyright © 2003-2019 AnaSCI.org. All rights reserved.