©ALL CONTENT OF THIS WEBSITE IS COPYRIGHTED AND CANNOT BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE ADMINISTRATORS CONSENT 2003-2020



~Prohormone Ban on the Horizon?~

WesleyInman

Registered User
Jul 28, 2013
79
0
6

Nattydread

AnaSCI VET / Donating Member
Jan 13, 2013
2,896
1
36
California
Glad to see the U.S government has its priorities straight.
As I type this tons of heroin and cocaine are crossing the border right on schedule
 

The Grim Repper

Super Moderator
Sep 26, 2008
4,352
4
38
Making it Happen Somewhere
Orrin Hatch (R-UT) is involved, google him and you'll see how he's used BS rhetoric to 'protect' consumers with the Dietary Supplement Full Implementation and Enforcement Act of 2010, legislation that "will help the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) protect consumers from unsafe dietary supplements and boost FDA accountability." Truth be told, he was looking to turn UT's supplement industry profits (at around $5B annually) through the roof because the bill only requires that supplements need to be “reasonably safe.” That’s it. Doesn't sound like he's too concerned with the health or safety of anything except the revenue generated in his state.
Orrin Hatch also inferred that a vote for the democrats' Kerry was going to turn the US into open season on Americans by terrorists. Another partisan scare tactic to win the election. Pathetic.
 

dorian777

Registered User
Apr 28, 2013
426
0
0
None of this shit makes sense. There is an indication at the federal level, that pot will be legal nationwide soon. So steroids are bad for you and pot is good?
 

Slate23

Registered User
Aug 17, 2013
900
0
0
NorthWest
Steroids have such a bad rep that it will be hard to get them legalized. There is so much misinformation and I think most steroid users are either afraid or ashamed to admit they use in public. Most of the pot users admit that they do it because its not as stigmatized anymore. So there is a pot lobby in congress. No such luck for gear users.
 

humpthebobcat

Registered User
Dec 22, 2013
585
0
0
So steroids are bad for you and pot is good?

in a word....yes lol

if I had a 16 year old son which I don't and he had the choice between going to GNC for pro hormones or the head shop for some ganja....can't really decide on which I'd rather him buy...probably the ganja tho
 

dorian777

Registered User
Apr 28, 2013
426
0
0
in a word....yes lol

if I had a 16 year old son which I don't and he had the choice between going to GNC for pro hormones or the head shop for some ganja....can't really decide on which I'd rather him buy...probably the ganja tho

Sorry, my son's gettin' the roids not pot. Pot makes you a brainless, estrogenic, lazy ass. Of course, this is what the gov't. wants from the next generation.
 

Slate23

Registered User
Aug 17, 2013
900
0
0
NorthWest
I don't smoke pot but you would be surprised by how many successful people do. I don't find it any more harmful than alcohol
 

6iron

Registered User
Jan 23, 2014
27
0
0
Under A Barbell
I would not be surprised if it was coming from a pharmaceutical lobby. They always use the excuse that they are protecting the American public just like in 1985 when the roid ban hit.
 

humpthebobcat

Registered User
Dec 22, 2013
585
0
0
Sorry, my son's gettin' the roids not pot. Pot makes you a brainless, estrogenic, lazy ass. Of course, this is what the gov't. wants from the next generation.

indeed...so in other words it would have no effect on 16 year olds haha
 

Daniel11

AnaSCI VET
Jul 10, 2013
1,139
0
0
I would not be surprised if it was coming from a pharmaceutical lobby. They always use the excuse that they are protecting the American public just like in 1985 when the roid ban hit.


It's supported by some natty supplement groups etc. basically it's commercial biggies that will make more money by getting rid of the small competition that makes products that actually work for body building. Big lobby groups basically.

Five major dietary supplement industry associations, including the United Natural Products Alliance and the Council for Responsible Nutrition, announced their support for the bill Tuesday.
 
Last edited:

BigBob

AnaSCI VET / Donating Member
Nov 10, 2012
2,912
0
36
It's supported by some natty supplement groups etc. basically it's commercial biggies that will make more money by getting rid of the small competition that makes products that actually work for body building. Big lobby groups basically.

Five major dietary supplement industry associations, including the United Natural Products Alliance and the Council for Responsible Nutrition, announced their support for the bill Tuesday.

Big Red Flag. I ts like the health insurance companies supporting Obama Care. Any Company that or organization that agrees with govt intervention is either co conspirators or trying to deal a blow to competition.