- Sep 17, 2003
- 8,628
- 18
- 38
A GOOD READ
Extreme Eating for Mass
By Jason Mueller
Bodybuilders are constantly in search of substances
that will increase anabolism. We take our creatine,
glutamine, pyruvate, and a host of other nutritional
supplements in our quest for more muscle. Bodybuilders
who choose to go the "enhanced" route are always
searching for the anabolic drug that will take their
physique to the next level. With all of the means at
our disposal to increase muscular bodyweight, one
simple fact often gets overlooked. Food is the most
anabolic substance we can put in our bodies.
What separates pro-bodybuilders from the rest of us? I
know that people like to engage in discussions about
aesthetics, muscle maturity, and symmetry. However,
it's painfully obvious that the primary difference is
muscular size. It's amusing for me to hear competitors
talk about how great their symmetry is despite the
fact that they don't have enough muscle to win a local
qualifier. Muscular size is the primary indicator of
success in bodybuilding competition. With regular
certainty, the largest man on stage wins the show.
Over the past several years, there has been a push
inside the supplement industry towards low-calories
mass building. We've seen "lean-mass" products appear
on the market, with all of the major supplements
companies like Met-RX and EAS advocating their MRP's
as a way to add lean tissue without gaining additional
fat. It is no longer en vogue to bulk-up in the
off-season, the industry line that is touted in the
magazines these days is that athletes rarely stray too
far from their contest bodyweights. With the advent of
these new nutritional technologies, it is now possible
to be both massively muscled and lean at all times.
Horseshit!!!
The truth is that the pictures seen in the various
bodybuilding publications are all taken immediately
before or after contests. It is not uncommon to see a
bodybuilder put on 20+ lbs the day after a contest!
Most bodybuilding aficionados don't have the slightest
idea of what these athletes look like 95% of the year.
It's mistakenly assumed that these guys always look
fairly lean and chiseled. Nothing could be further
from the truth.
By attempting to stay lean year-round, you are
sabotaging your goals to become as muscular as humanly
possible. Athletes who constantly chase more muscle
while worrying about body fat levels will never gain
the muscle they need to achieve their goals. Let's
consider this question: Which is harder to build, fat
or muscle? Obviously, muscle. Next question. Which is
easier to lose, fat or muscle? For those of you that
said muscle, sorry, wrong answer, thanks for playing.
Once muscle is built it's a fairly easy proposition to
maintain it while dieting off body fat.
I honestly can't fault anyone for following these
"lean mass" programs. Being bloated and fat in the
off-season isn't any fun. If any of you have had the
chance to see Lee Priest in the off-season, you'll
know what I mean. The man is nearly unrecognizable
from the contest and ad pictures we constantly see in
the various publications. Lee doesn't get just a
little heavy, he gets fat. It don't think he would be
offended if I say he looks like a lop of shit.
However, when the fat comes off, and it surely does
every year, Lee's physique is amazing. If you talk to
Lee, and ask him what his secret to success is, he'll
tell you. It's food.
So, why all the secrecy and smoke and mirrors
surrounding the nutritional profiles of these
athletes? One simple reason. Money. Money from
endorsements, contracts, and ad work. Say I'm an up
and coming national level bodybuilder. I'm eating over
7,000 calories a day. In order to do this, I'm
consuming a lot of fatty foods, hell, I'm eating
McDonalds and ice cream as much as possible. Why?
Because I cannot physically consume that level of
caloric intake in clean, low-fat foods. It cannot be
done. However, do the supplement companies want their
customers to know this? Of course not. Look, it's an
accepted premise that all national and professional
level bodybuilders take steroids, right? However, it's
something that's never discussed in the supplement
industry, and bodybuilders get paid to endorse
products. So, they lie. My success is based largely on
the fact that I use XYZ Protein. I was able to compete
20 lb heavier at this year's Mr. O because I was
taking Sportgear prohormones. Whatever. My point isn't
that nutritional supplements don't have their place,
they certainly do. (We'll discuss that in a feature
article in next month's issue of Anabolic Extreme) My
point is that professional bodybuilders are used
because there is a large segment of the population
that would like to emulate that look. If they can be
made to believe that look is obtained through clean
eating and sports supplements, who's hurt, right?
I've seen so many genetically gifted bodybuilders fail
in the quest to achieve greatness. 9 times out of 10
the culprit is nutrition. Specifically, the problem is
not consuming enough calories. I can't tell you how
many times I've had an athlete come to me who has hit
a plateau. I modify their nutrition slightly and they
are growing again. People, you are not going to
achieve brutal muscle size on 3,500 kcal a day!! I
don't care what anyone else tells you, I've seen it
fail and I know it doesn't work. All successful
national and professional level bodybuilders eat all
day long. In the off-season their only concern is
getting those meals in and eating enough protein.
Anyone can train intensely given the right
circumstances and knowledge. Any fool can jab
themselves with steroids. However, there are very few
people in the sport of bodybuilding that are
consistently able, day in and day out, to eat their
6-8 meals a day and consume enough calories to reach
anabolic extreme. (Please refer to the Ian Harrison
interview in this month's issue for Ian's thoughts on
off-season bodybuilding nutrition)
What are your goals as a bodybuilder? Is it your goal
to have an aesthetically pleasing physique, staying
relatively lean year round? Or is it to carry as much
muscle as your genetic potential will allow? One goal
is not nobler than the other, but they certainly
require different strategies. While it is possible to
stay relatively lean year round once a desired level
of muscle has been achieved, it is not possible to do
this while trying to gain the muscle initially. Unless
extraordinary circumstances are present, muscle cannot
be added and fat lost at the same time!! The
conditions necessary for this to happen are so rare
and require so many drugs that it's not worthy of
discussion in this article. Muscle is gained by eating
over and above what is required for maintenance. Fat
is lost by eating less than what is required for
maintenance. It's virtually impossible to gain muscle
without adding some concomitant fat, conversely, it's
almost impossible to lose fat without losing
concomitant muscle tissue. These are the irrefutable
facts.
Extreme Eating for Mass
By Jason Mueller
Bodybuilders are constantly in search of substances
that will increase anabolism. We take our creatine,
glutamine, pyruvate, and a host of other nutritional
supplements in our quest for more muscle. Bodybuilders
who choose to go the "enhanced" route are always
searching for the anabolic drug that will take their
physique to the next level. With all of the means at
our disposal to increase muscular bodyweight, one
simple fact often gets overlooked. Food is the most
anabolic substance we can put in our bodies.
What separates pro-bodybuilders from the rest of us? I
know that people like to engage in discussions about
aesthetics, muscle maturity, and symmetry. However,
it's painfully obvious that the primary difference is
muscular size. It's amusing for me to hear competitors
talk about how great their symmetry is despite the
fact that they don't have enough muscle to win a local
qualifier. Muscular size is the primary indicator of
success in bodybuilding competition. With regular
certainty, the largest man on stage wins the show.
Over the past several years, there has been a push
inside the supplement industry towards low-calories
mass building. We've seen "lean-mass" products appear
on the market, with all of the major supplements
companies like Met-RX and EAS advocating their MRP's
as a way to add lean tissue without gaining additional
fat. It is no longer en vogue to bulk-up in the
off-season, the industry line that is touted in the
magazines these days is that athletes rarely stray too
far from their contest bodyweights. With the advent of
these new nutritional technologies, it is now possible
to be both massively muscled and lean at all times.
Horseshit!!!
The truth is that the pictures seen in the various
bodybuilding publications are all taken immediately
before or after contests. It is not uncommon to see a
bodybuilder put on 20+ lbs the day after a contest!
Most bodybuilding aficionados don't have the slightest
idea of what these athletes look like 95% of the year.
It's mistakenly assumed that these guys always look
fairly lean and chiseled. Nothing could be further
from the truth.
By attempting to stay lean year-round, you are
sabotaging your goals to become as muscular as humanly
possible. Athletes who constantly chase more muscle
while worrying about body fat levels will never gain
the muscle they need to achieve their goals. Let's
consider this question: Which is harder to build, fat
or muscle? Obviously, muscle. Next question. Which is
easier to lose, fat or muscle? For those of you that
said muscle, sorry, wrong answer, thanks for playing.
Once muscle is built it's a fairly easy proposition to
maintain it while dieting off body fat.
I honestly can't fault anyone for following these
"lean mass" programs. Being bloated and fat in the
off-season isn't any fun. If any of you have had the
chance to see Lee Priest in the off-season, you'll
know what I mean. The man is nearly unrecognizable
from the contest and ad pictures we constantly see in
the various publications. Lee doesn't get just a
little heavy, he gets fat. It don't think he would be
offended if I say he looks like a lop of shit.
However, when the fat comes off, and it surely does
every year, Lee's physique is amazing. If you talk to
Lee, and ask him what his secret to success is, he'll
tell you. It's food.
So, why all the secrecy and smoke and mirrors
surrounding the nutritional profiles of these
athletes? One simple reason. Money. Money from
endorsements, contracts, and ad work. Say I'm an up
and coming national level bodybuilder. I'm eating over
7,000 calories a day. In order to do this, I'm
consuming a lot of fatty foods, hell, I'm eating
McDonalds and ice cream as much as possible. Why?
Because I cannot physically consume that level of
caloric intake in clean, low-fat foods. It cannot be
done. However, do the supplement companies want their
customers to know this? Of course not. Look, it's an
accepted premise that all national and professional
level bodybuilders take steroids, right? However, it's
something that's never discussed in the supplement
industry, and bodybuilders get paid to endorse
products. So, they lie. My success is based largely on
the fact that I use XYZ Protein. I was able to compete
20 lb heavier at this year's Mr. O because I was
taking Sportgear prohormones. Whatever. My point isn't
that nutritional supplements don't have their place,
they certainly do. (We'll discuss that in a feature
article in next month's issue of Anabolic Extreme) My
point is that professional bodybuilders are used
because there is a large segment of the population
that would like to emulate that look. If they can be
made to believe that look is obtained through clean
eating and sports supplements, who's hurt, right?
I've seen so many genetically gifted bodybuilders fail
in the quest to achieve greatness. 9 times out of 10
the culprit is nutrition. Specifically, the problem is
not consuming enough calories. I can't tell you how
many times I've had an athlete come to me who has hit
a plateau. I modify their nutrition slightly and they
are growing again. People, you are not going to
achieve brutal muscle size on 3,500 kcal a day!! I
don't care what anyone else tells you, I've seen it
fail and I know it doesn't work. All successful
national and professional level bodybuilders eat all
day long. In the off-season their only concern is
getting those meals in and eating enough protein.
Anyone can train intensely given the right
circumstances and knowledge. Any fool can jab
themselves with steroids. However, there are very few
people in the sport of bodybuilding that are
consistently able, day in and day out, to eat their
6-8 meals a day and consume enough calories to reach
anabolic extreme. (Please refer to the Ian Harrison
interview in this month's issue for Ian's thoughts on
off-season bodybuilding nutrition)
What are your goals as a bodybuilder? Is it your goal
to have an aesthetically pleasing physique, staying
relatively lean year round? Or is it to carry as much
muscle as your genetic potential will allow? One goal
is not nobler than the other, but they certainly
require different strategies. While it is possible to
stay relatively lean year round once a desired level
of muscle has been achieved, it is not possible to do
this while trying to gain the muscle initially. Unless
extraordinary circumstances are present, muscle cannot
be added and fat lost at the same time!! The
conditions necessary for this to happen are so rare
and require so many drugs that it's not worthy of
discussion in this article. Muscle is gained by eating
over and above what is required for maintenance. Fat
is lost by eating less than what is required for
maintenance. It's virtually impossible to gain muscle
without adding some concomitant fat, conversely, it's
almost impossible to lose fat without losing
concomitant muscle tissue. These are the irrefutable
facts.