long cycles??

[Arnie]

hey i just wanted opinions on long cycles, like 20 + weeks, long as you get a blood test at the start and middle and end and see that you levels are ok and receptors, liver etc... i gues you would have to change your dosages? i guess to keep your size more all year round.. has anyone done it

thanks Arnie.

 

[mario_ps2]

i FOR ONE I'm against long cycles because it's harder to recover, there is only around 30 days that our body grows while on cycle after that it diminishes completely, and you will have to wait more to do another cycle.
[time on = time off]
so 20 weeks on gear = 20 weeks off... ouch.. that's a lonnnnnnnnng wait.

I believe it's better do to 4 weeks(usually a higher dosage than normal) followed by 4 weeks off with frontloading during the 1st week to get the compound kicked in as soon as possible rather than waiting 4 weeks to start seeing effects.

This type of cycles are beginning to become very popular and we get away with all the negative side effects as they claim.