- Feb 2, 2013
- 1,632
- 0
- 0
Warning this may have no continuity and in no way is meant to disrespect natural competitors or competitions. However, I am speaking towards a small percentage of athletes and their attitudes and ignorance.
Let me begin with a short bio of myself who now in my mid 40's begain training 12 years ago and then began AAS 7 years ago. Since then I have done two bbing shows (did well first time), and 3 PLing meets as well as adding over 80lbs to my genetically challenged frame. I say that to say, I have a platform to speak from. Less than some, but more than most.
Anyway, my contention with a pecentage of the "natural" competitors is two fold. The first is the attitude that if "they" were to juice they could accomplish the same things as a enhanced lifter or more. There may be a shred of truth in that, but it seams like a stretch to assume the only difference between a winner and a loser is AAS. I have no doubt PED's have helped me do things I would not have accomplished otherwise, but I have also been in this 12 years, rarely missed a day I did not make up and put in the hard work. So, I don't like some half squatting pussy who never dawned a singlet assuming he could accomplish the same things.
I am so tired of over hearing wannabe's at meets or shows say, he's juicing...PED's help, but they do not give you discipline, work ethic or the sack to put yourself on the stage or platform to be judged.
My second and larger point of contention is with federations like IPF. The IPF for those unfamiliar stands for International Powerlifting Federation. They are old and serious as well as being misguided into thinking they may one day make it into the Olympics. They are also know for drug testing their athletes. And apparently, this randomized testing means none of their athletes use PED's. I just want to scream there is a difference between being drug free and passing a drug test.
However, according to their thinking they have the strongest athletes in the PLing world, but they are all natural. I want to say, if that is the case why test at all since your athletes are just as strong without AAS? Come on, a dude passes one year and fails the next...I guess he just started using AAS that year.
I am not sure if there are bbing shows with that attitude but it bugs the shit out of me and on top of that I have never heard a enhanced athlete talk down to a natural competitor...
OK, I am out of gas...feel free to correct me or add your own.
Hawk
Let me begin with a short bio of myself who now in my mid 40's begain training 12 years ago and then began AAS 7 years ago. Since then I have done two bbing shows (did well first time), and 3 PLing meets as well as adding over 80lbs to my genetically challenged frame. I say that to say, I have a platform to speak from. Less than some, but more than most.
Anyway, my contention with a pecentage of the "natural" competitors is two fold. The first is the attitude that if "they" were to juice they could accomplish the same things as a enhanced lifter or more. There may be a shred of truth in that, but it seams like a stretch to assume the only difference between a winner and a loser is AAS. I have no doubt PED's have helped me do things I would not have accomplished otherwise, but I have also been in this 12 years, rarely missed a day I did not make up and put in the hard work. So, I don't like some half squatting pussy who never dawned a singlet assuming he could accomplish the same things.
I am so tired of over hearing wannabe's at meets or shows say, he's juicing...PED's help, but they do not give you discipline, work ethic or the sack to put yourself on the stage or platform to be judged.
My second and larger point of contention is with federations like IPF. The IPF for those unfamiliar stands for International Powerlifting Federation. They are old and serious as well as being misguided into thinking they may one day make it into the Olympics. They are also know for drug testing their athletes. And apparently, this randomized testing means none of their athletes use PED's. I just want to scream there is a difference between being drug free and passing a drug test.
However, according to their thinking they have the strongest athletes in the PLing world, but they are all natural. I want to say, if that is the case why test at all since your athletes are just as strong without AAS? Come on, a dude passes one year and fails the next...I guess he just started using AAS that year.
I am not sure if there are bbing shows with that attitude but it bugs the shit out of me and on top of that I have never heard a enhanced athlete talk down to a natural competitor...
OK, I am out of gas...feel free to correct me or add your own.
Hawk